Developing a Tool for Accession to Assessment Exam Cytological of the Cervix
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3823/1999Keywords:
women's health, prevention of cervical cancer, Public HealthAbstract
Objective: To develop a tool for assessing the adherence of women performing the cytological examination of the cervix. Method: exploratory, descriptive with quantitative approach, which followed four steps for the construction of the instrument. Held between May and July 2015, using a sample of 384 women attending health facilities in João Pessoa city family. Data were analyzed by applying factor analysis and then correspondence analysis. Results: Scores were calculated from the influential factors reported by these women to perform the cytological examination, and then these scores were associated with the frequency of the examination. As for frequency, 37% performed annually, 25.1% every two years and 20.5% every six months, associated between the low and medium scores. While the high score was associated with a lower frequency, corresponding to 1.3% of those who underwent the test every three years and 15.9% who said they have set periods for their realization. Conclusion: The difficulties for not performing the examination, worse adherence to these women that health care, requiring effective interventions of professionals to minimize these barriers.
References
Rico AM, Iriart JAB. Discursos e práticas preventivas do câncer do colo do útero Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 2013; 29(9): 1763-73, set.
Silva MAS et al. Fatores relacionados a não adesão à realização do exame de Papanicolau. Rev Rene., 2015; 16(4): 532-9.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Controle dos cânceres do colo do útero e da mama / Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica. – 2. ed. – BrasÃlia : Editora do Ministério da Saúde, 2013. 124 p.: il. (Cadernos de Atenção Básica, n. 13).
Correio KDL et al. Controle do câncer do colo do útero: ações desenvolvidas pelo enfermeiro à luz do discurso do sujeito coletivo. J. res.: fundam. care. Online, v. 7, n. 2, 2015. p. 2425-39.
Brito-Silva K et al. Integralidade no cuidado ao câncer do colo do útero: avaliação do acesso. Rev Saúde Pública. 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 240-248.
Coluci MZO, Alexandre NMC, Milani D. Construção de instrumentos de medida na área da saúde. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 20, n. 3, 2015. p. 925-936.
Pasquali L. Instrumentação psicológica: fundamentos e práticas. p.189 Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2010.
Oliveira PSD et al. Adesão das mulheres ao exame preventivo de câncer de colo de útero: um ensaio comunitário. Rev enferm UFPE on line., Recife. 2016; 10(2):442-8, fev.
Navarro C. et al. Cobertura do rastreamento do câncer de colo de útero em região de alta incidência. Rev Saúde Pública 2015;49:17
Ormonde Júnior LC, Oliveira LD, Sá RM. Fatores de adesão e não adesão das mulheres ao exame colpacitológico. Revista Eletrônica Gestão & Saúde. 2015; 6(1): p.184-00.
Dias EGD et al. Avaliação do conhecimento em relação à prevenção do câncer do colo uterino entre mulheres de uma Unidade de Saúde. Rev Epidemiol Control Infect. 2015;5(3):136-140
Borges MFSO et al. Prevalência do exame preventivo de câncer do colo do útero em Rio Branco, Acre, Brasil, e fatores associados à não-realização do exame. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro. 2012; 28(6):1156-66.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access and Benefits of Publishing Open Access).
Â
Â
