Assessment of Urinalysis Reflex to Culture Criteria: Impact on Antimicrobial Usage
Keywords:Antimicrobial Resistance, Antimicrobial Usage, Urinalysis, Urinalysis Reflex Criteria, Urinary Tract Infections
Objectives: To assess the predictive value of the urinalysis (UA) reflex criteriaâ€™s parameters and to evaluate the criteriaâ€™s impact on antimicrobial usage
Methods: A prospective study using laboratory data was conducted on inpatient urine samples with orders placed for Urinalysis Reflex Culture (UARC) in a 400-bed acute care hospital. A total of 4016 urine samples were collected and examined between February and April 2020. The UA results were then subjected to the laboratory UA reflex criteria for reflecting UA to culture. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized in evaluating the effectiveness of the criteriaâ€™s parameters to predict positive urine cultures
Results: The total number of the positive UA reflex samples was 1539, which accounted for 38.3% of all the UA samples. Moreover, those positive UA samples were reflexed to urine cultures. Among the urine samples that were cultured, 45.1% (n = 694) were negative urine cultures while 54.9% (n = 845) were positive urine cultures. The UA reflex criterion was associated with positive predictive values for positive urine cultures between 26.30% and 92.96%.
Conclusions: The current Laboratory UA reflex criterion is not highly effective in predicting positive urine culture, thus potentially leading to the inappropriate antimicrobial usage.
Altorf-van der Kuil W, Schoffelen AF, de Greeff SC, et al.
National laboratory-based surveillance system for antimicrobial
resistance: a successful tool to support the control of
antimicrobial resistance in the Netherlands. Euro Surveill Bull Eur
Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull 2017; 22.
Li B, Webster TJ. Bacteria antibiotic resistance: New challenges
and opportunities for implant-associated orthopedic infections.
J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc 2018; 36:22-32.
Agarwal R. Quality-Improvement Measures as Effective Ways of
Preventing Laboratory Errors. Lab Med 2014; 45:e80-e88.
Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Antibiotic
resistance threats in the United States, 2013. 2013. Available at:
Humphries RM, Dien Bard J. Point-Counterpoint: Reflex Cultures
Reduce Laboratory Workload and Improve Antimicrobial
Stewardship in Patients Suspected of Having Urinary Tract
Infections. J Clin Microbiol 2016; 54:254-258.
Fok C, Fitzgerald MP, Turk T, et al. Reflex testing of male urine
specimens misses few positive cultures may reduce unnecessary
testing of normal specimens. Urology 2010; 75:74-76.
Adedeji WA. The Treasure Called Antibiotics. Ann Ib Postgrad
Med 2016; 14:56-57.
Adrizain R, Setiabudi D, Chairulfatah A. The inappropriate use
of antibiotics in hospitalized dengue virus-infected children with
presumed concurrent bacterial infection in teaching and private
hospitals in Bandung, Indonesia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2019;
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outpatient
Antibiotic Prescriptions - United States, 2017. 2014. Available
Aitken SL, Dilworth TJ, Heil EL, et al. Agricultural Applications for
Antimicrobials. A Danger to Human Health: An Official Position
Statement of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.
Pharmacotherapy 2016; 36:422-432.
Bergfeldt V. Microbes that never sleep: A multidisciplinary
study of the antibiotic resistance management in Sweden.;
Available at: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:d
iva-30623. Accessed May 28, 2020.
Alumran A, Hou X-Y, Hurst C. Validity and reliability of
instruments designed to measure factors influencing the
overuse of antibiotics. J Infect Public Health 2012; 5:221-232.
Ashiru-Oredope D, Hopkins S. Antimicrobial resistance: moving
from professional engagement to public action. J Antimicrob
Chemother 2015; 70:2927-2930.
Chang Y-Y, Chen H-P, Lin C-W, et al. Implementation and
outcomes of an antimicrobial stewardship program: Effectiveness
of education. J Chin Med Assoc JCMA 2017; 80:353-359.
Schroeder AR, Chang PW, Shen MW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy
of the urinalysis for urinary tract infection in infants <3 months
of age. Pediatrics 2015; 135:965-971.
Rabinovitch A, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
Urinalysis: approved guideline. Wayne, Pa.: Clinical and
Laboratory Standards Institute; 2009.
Richards KA, Cesario S, Best SL, et al. Reflex urine culture testing
in an ambulatory urology clinic: Implications for antibiotic
stewardship in urology. Int J Urol Off J Jpn Urol Assoc 2019;
Jaeger C, Waymack J, Sullivan P, et al. Refining reflex urine
culture testing in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2019; 37:1380-1382.
Wold K, Brock J, Percival K, et al. Assessment of Reflex Urine
Culture Criteria Changes and its Impact on Treatment of
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;
Yarbrough ML. Impact of Reflex Algorithms on Urine Culture
Utilization. Clin Microbiol Newsl 2018; 40:19-24.
Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, et al. Implementing an
Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious
Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare
Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62:e51-e77.
Islam J, Ashiru-Oredope D, Budd E, et al. A national quality
incentive scheme to reduce antibiotic overuse in hospitals:
evaluation of perceptions and impact. J Antimicrob Chemother
Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, et al. Urinary
tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and
treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol 2015; 13:269-284.
Schmiemann G, Kniehl E, Gebhardt K, et al. The diagnosis of
urinary tract infection: a systematic review. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access and Benefits of Publishing Open Access).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Articles are published Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License Â©
Copyright policies & self-archiving
|Author's Pre-print:||author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)|
|Author's Post-print:||author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing)|
|Publisher's Version/PDF:||author can archive publisher's version/PDF|